The War Against the PLDC
Or, The Destruction of America’s Public Enemy #1,
The Progressive, Liberal, Democrat Cabal
Here we begin Volume 3 of the Atlas Trilogy. The original volume was, of course, my “auntie’s” magnum opus from the middle of the 20th Century. It was a cautionary tale of the power of the central government to destroy the American Dream and lead the country into deadly chaos, despite the efforts of the best and brightest among us – in this case, “John Galt” and “Dagney Taggert” – the imaginary doppelgangers for my parents. Fictional at its publishing, it has proven prophetic in the first decade and a half of the 21st Century.
Volume 2, Atlas Speaks, is a treatise about how virtually all of her predictions came to pass in the last one-hundred years – from Woodrow Wilson to Barack Obama and the rest of the progressive/liberal/Democrat Cabal – the PLDC. Its voice is that of the son of “John Galt” and “Dagney Taggert”, who has lived through the post-World War II period when the major damage to our constitutional republic has occurred and paints an historically exhaustive picture of who, what, where, why, when and how it happened.
Volume 3, Atlas Stands, proposes a remedy for what ails the United States of America – a solution centered on restoring political power to the People so that they can reclaim the rights guaranteed to them in the Constitution – which have been surreptitiously and unconstitutionally usurped from them over the last century by a long list of persons – in politics, the courts, the federal bureaucracy, academia, the press/media and the infotainment industry who all sought to substitute their personal desires for the altruistic desires the Founders. The time has come for all real Americans to stand up and be counted!
Confederation to Coup d’état:
The presidential campaign of 2016, which resulted in the election of a political outsider with no loyalty to the political power brokers in the federal government, caused the PLDC to reveal itself in a new and more sinister form – clandestine assets planted deep within the federal bureaucracy (now popularly called the “deep state” or the “dark state”), secretly and illegally collecting bits and pieces of personal and private information through eavesdropping on the communications platforms of American citizens who happened to be political enemies, for the purpose of bringing down the new, independent administration of Donald J. Trump in cooperation with and coordination by the other elements of the PLDC.
Immediately after the inauguration of the new President, the press/media, the courts, university professors across the country and numerous Hollywood and New York City elites rallied their traditional allies (teacher’s unions, abortioneers, feminists, the ACLU, professional protesters, etc.) and activated new clandestine progressive/liberal allies in the intelligence community (with access to all surreptitiously collected and classified private communications information of America’s citizens) to the call of the Democrat Party to distribute, debate and demonstrate in support of the propaganda produced by their hidden assets in the government.
The purpose was to force it into the template they had created of a corrupt Republican campaign, directed and supported by the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, purportedly a close friend of the Republican candidate, who had allegedly hacked into the Democrat National Committee computers and stolen secret e-mails of Hillary Clinton to be used to destroy her candidacy.
Subsequently, an entirely new avenue of investigation came to light with the murder of a senior Democrat National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, in July 2016, just before tens of thousands of classified e-mails belonging to Hillary Clinton were published by WikiLeaks.
“The chief of the government accountability group Judicial Watch contends there’s “credible evidence” that needs to be addressed in the murder investigation of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.
Private investigators who believe Rich may have been the source of the DNC emails published by WikiLeaks have claimed the investigation has been corrupted by political influence.
Judicial Watch’s President Tom Fitton notes the claims that Rich was involved in the leak of the DNC emails and that the probe has been compromised. “I don’t know whether any of that’s true,” Fitton says. “WikiLeaks strongly suggests it’s true.”
But he says there’s “enough credible information out in the media … to suggest there was some hanky-panky.” Judicial Watch has filed a FOIA with the D.C. police department and the mayor’s office. “We’re not going to be cowed … we’re going to ask the questions.”
Rich was murdered July 10, 2016, in his affluent neighborhood in Washington, D.C. He was shot in the back with a handgun at at 4:18 a.m., a block from his home and although the police reported it as a robbery, nothing was taken from him. He was transported to a local hospital and was pronounced dead at 5:57 a.m.
On July 22, 2016, just 12 days after Rich’s death and days before the Democratic Party Convention in Philadelphia, WikiLeaks released 20,000 emails from DNC officials that had been stored on computers in the DNC’s Washington office.
The office of Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser issued a statement asserting Rich was killed in an attempted robbery. The statement came amid a claim by private investigators that the Metropolitan Police Department had been directed by Bowser to tone down its investigation.
“This is a robbery that ended tragically. Any homicide in the District of Columbia gets the full attention of the Metropolitan Police Department,” Bowser’s deputy press secretary, Susana Castillo said. “In fact, MPD has a cold-case unit that focuses on solving homicides in D.C. no matter how old they are.”
Private investigators are certain Bowser has ordered a halt to the investigation. Jack Burkman, the head of the Washington, D.C.-based Profiling Project investigative team, believes D.C. police officials have colluded with the mayor to suspended the investigation. He said police are refusing to cooperate with anyone involved and are withholding key evidence from the public and obstructing the investigation for political purposes.
“I very strongly believe that the D.C. police and the D.C. mayor, for her own political reasons, want this ended,” he said. “This is going to become an issue in the mayor’s race, and this is really going to hurt her politics. This is a real black eye. This is becoming a real big thing – it’s on its way to becoming an O.J., and it could derail the mayor’s re-election.”
Burkman said the evidence indicates it was not a robbery, and he said the Rich family is also doubtful that Rich, whose body was found with his valuables, was murdered during a robbery.
“If it was a robbery – it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money, he still has his credit cards, still had his phone – so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life,” Joel Rich, Seth’s father, acknowledged days after his son was killed.
Private investigator Rod Wheeler, who was hired by Rich’s parents in March to find their son’s killer, suspects Rich’s death is linked to his work at the DNC and explained why there is no evidence to support the police’s assertion he was murdered during a “botched” robbery.
“I’ve been hitting the ground out there talking with people – typical things we do in a homicide investigation. I haven’t found anything to support the theory that this was a street robbery.”
After months of investigating Rich’s murder, the Rich family revealed to the veteran homicide detective on May 15 that former DNC Chair Donna Brazille contacted the Washington, DC police department after he inquired with homicide detectives for information on Rich’s case.
[This information brings new issues about the scope of interference in the investigation – raising it to the national level because of the insertion of a most influential Democrat operative into the process. Donna Brazile was already heavily invested in Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
A WikiLeaks release revealed that interim DNC Chair and CNN contributor Donna Brazile, when working as a DNC vice chair, forwarded to the Clinton campaign a January 2016 emailobtained from the Bernie Sanders campaign, released by Sarah Ford, Sanders’ deputy national press secretary, announcing a Twitter storm from Sanders’ African-American outreach team. “FYI” Brazile wrote to the Clinton staff. “Thank you for the heads up on this Donna,” replied Clinton campaign spokesperson Adrienne Elrod.”
“The former interim chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee also admitted that she fed Hillary Clintona question that would be asked during a televised town hall debate last year. Although she initially denied sending emails to a Clinton staffer about the question, the long-time Democratic Party operative now writes in Time magazine that it ‘was a mistake I will forever regret.’
‘[Allegedly hacked emails] revealed that among the many things I did in my role as a Democratic operative and DNC Vice Chair prior to assuming the interim DNC Chair position was to share potential town hall topics with the Clinton campaign,’ Brazile writes.
‘I had been working behind the scenes to add more town hall events and debates to the primary calendar, and I helped ensure those events included diverse moderators and addressed topics vital to minority communities.’
‘My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen. But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret.’
On March 12, 2016, one day before the CNN-moderated Democratic debate between Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Brazile sent an email about the death penalty to Clinton staffer Jennifer Palmieri with the subject: ‘From time to time I get the questions in advance,’ according to emails obtained by WikiLeaks [whatever that means]
The death penalty question was repeated verbatim in an email that debate co-host Roland Martin sent to CNN producers the next day, and the question was asked using similar wording during the event in Columbus, Ohio.
Brazile’s message was among the emails from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s account that were [allegedly] hacked by an unknown agent and then published by WikiLeaks.
Initially, Brazile denied sending the emails [and the typical obfuscation began]. During an appearance on Fox News, she claimed that the hacked emails which were published by WikiLeaks were altered.
When Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly confronted Brazile on October 19 asking how she got the question in advance, Brazile said she refused to be ‘persecuted’ before adding:
‘I am not going to try to validate falsified information.’ ‘I have my documents. I have my files. Thank god I haven’t had my emails ripped off from me and stolen and given to some criminal to come back altered.’ ‘As a Christian woman, I understand persecution but I will not stand here and be persecuted because your information is totally false.’ ‘Podesta’s emails were stolen. You’re so interested in talking about stolen material, you’re like a thief that wants to bring into the night the things that you found that was in the gutter.’
Additionally, Seth Rich’s personal computer was retreived from his residence by the Metro DC police at the time of the murder. To date, that computer has not been made available for analysis by any reputable agency – like the FBI. Curious.]
Wheeler has been incessantly repudiated by Brad Bauman – the Rich family’s spokes- man, who has been allegedly “assigned” by the Democratic National Committee to represent the family – for not ruling out the possibility that Rich’s death may be related to the DNC emails turned over to WikiLeaks.
Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, told CNN Wednesday: “My fear is our constant focusing on the Russians is deflecting away from some other things that we need to be investigating. There’s still some question as to whether the intrusion of the DNC server was an insider job or whether or not it was the Russians.”
For anyone who has read Atlas Speaks, this all sounds sickeningly familiar. Does the name Vince Foster ring a bell?
The ultimate aim of this effort was to be a silent coup d’état of the new administration but, in the course of the countless investigations, inquiries, special counsels and investigative reports, it has been revealed that the PLDC effort to regain political power has compromised the nation’s intelligence apparatus and the Federal Bureau of Investigation – leaving the American people blind, deaf, dumb and distrustful of the truth about both foreign and domestic interests that intend to do harm to our Constitutional republic.
So, what the heck happened over the past 70 years, culminating in the most recent attacks upon Constitutional freedoms? Quite frankly, we lost faith – faith in the Almighty as our protector, faith in the Judeo-Christian ethic upon which this nation was founded, faith in the wisdom the Founders passed down to us in the Constitution (Drafters and Ratifiers alike), which encompassed all the wisdom gathered from the struggles and triumphs of Western Civilization, and faith in ourselves and each other. I call these the Five Pillars of Freedom.
Loss of: Casualty:
Faith in the Almighty truth
Faith in our institutions universal education, government
Faith in ourselves American exceptionalism
Faith in the wisdom the Founders personal responsibility
Faith in our neighbors respect
The first casualty of this loss of faith has been truth (synonymous with fact – something which is the case – either physical or intellectual, that is processed by the human mind). Therefore, truth must be the first principle restor
Iconic English author George Orwell once said: “The further society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”
In America, we are guaranteed by incontrovertible writings that we are, each of us, sovereign persons and therefore are granted by our Creator the inalienable rights to life, liberty and those things that make us happy. Inherent, rational, logical and also inalienable within these rights is the right to truth so that we may remain secure by preserving these rights within a government that was designed by the Founders, deriving its’ just powers from the consent of the governed – the People, through the vote – but operated by fallible human beings.
Nowhere in the Great Document did we, the People, grant the Federal government the power to alter or withhold, or allow others associated in any way with the government or the functioning of our constitutional republic, to alter or withhold the whole truth from the People as a matter of course as our judicial oath commands – but that is what is happening on the grandest of scales. (There are understandable exceptions for national security and ongoing legal proceedings.) What has happened to truth in America since our one shining moment? That, too, is a long story.
Throughout our history as a nation there have been instances where truth was stretched, Washington Irving’s wildly inaccurate biography of the first President being the best example. Writings about Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt are also instances of historical mythology – part truth, part fabrication. For the most part, our free press kept the government honest because of the sheer volume of news sources in the country, the quest for the “story” by ambitious editors and reporters and the lingering distrust of government amongst the people.
In the politics of the day in the 19th Century, innuendo, rumor, insinuation, gossip, half-truth and the-big-lie were common currency in the press but people were more cautious when these musings came from politicians or their henchmen. If readers smelled a rat in a government influenced daily (mostly big city papers), they would and did move quickly to a competitor. These were never orchestrated campaigns but simply individuals exercising their right to have access to truthful free speech. Today, voters literally cannot trust most information peddled in the public square despite valiant efforts by a small minority who suffer outrageous personal attacks from the PLDC – the politics of personal destruction on full display.
Actual government control of information through an orchestrated campaign across the entire spectrum of outlets for public information, with a new level of scope and sophistication, began with the arrival of progressive Democrat Woodrow Wilson in the Presidency in 1915. The executive branch effectively took control of the truth during the First World War through the coercion of and cooperation by the press and the deception of the People.
Woodrow Wilson’s Committee on Public Information (CPI) was created to influence American public opinion toward supporting U.S. participation in World War I via a prolonged propaganda campaign in America and overseas. The CPI used material that was loosely based on fact, but spun it to present an upbeat picture of the American war effort.
Propaganda may be defined as the attempt to manipulate public opinion for the purpose of helping or hurting a particular cause, individual or group. The propagandist seeks to control thought rather than to inform. It is the antithesis of truth and the free press but, apparently of no consequence to the first Progressive President.
“The committee used the press, posters, radio, telegraph, cable and movies to broadcast its message. It recruited about 75,000 “Four-Minute Men,” volunteers who spoke about the war at social events for an ideal length of four minutes, considering that the average human attention-span was judged at the time to be four minutes.
It was estimated that by the end of the war, they had made more than 7.5 million speeches to 314 million people in 5,200 communities. The CPI staged events designed for specific ethnic groups. For instance, famous Irish-American tenor John McCormack sang at Mount Vernon before an audience representing Irish-American organizations. The Committee also targeted the American worker and, endorsed by unionist Samuel Gompers, filled factories and offices with posters designed to promote the critical role of American labor in the success of the war effort.
In a typical American family, every item of war news they saw – in newsreels at the movies, in the small-town dailies and weeklies, in magazines, or in the city daily – was not merely officially approved information but precisely the same information that millions of their fellow citizens were getting at the same moment. Every war story had been censored somewhere along the line – at the source, in transit, or in the newspaper offices in accordance with ‘voluntary’ rules established by the CPI.”
This was propaganda on a massive scale, breaking faith with the American people who believed in a free press and a government that they believed trusted their collective judgment. The CPI was disbanded in mid-1919 but its effectiveness was not lost on the losers in the war. It would be resurrected in Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, on the other hand, was a completely different animal. He was born an only child in 1882 into a wealthy New York State family that was known as the Duchess County (north of NYC) Branch of the Roosevelt’s. He was a fifth cousin of Republican President Theodore Roosevelt – who was a member of the Oyster Bay (Long Island) Branch of the family. His mother was Sarah Delano, whose family had made their fortune from the China Trade – especially the opium trade – earlier in the 19th Century.
“He was fawned over and adored by his mother all of his life. This led to a need to be the center of attention and, preferably, worshipped by those close to him. Of course, this caused problems when he went off to Groton Academy and Harvard University (as all Roosevelt boys did). He came across as thinking of himself as superior to his peers which led to occasional social ostracism and may have sparked lifelong bouts of depression and opportunities for retribution against [his peers in] the privileged classes. No hypocrisy there.
More importantly, this need led to infidelity in his marriage to Eleanor Roosevelt, the daughter of Theodore Roosevelt’s younger brother Elliot and Anna (Livingston) Hall, born in NYC in 1884. She was orphaned at age 9 in 1894, both of her parents having died less than two years apart, and was raised by her maternal grandmother. She and FDR married in 1905 and remained married (eventually in name only) until his death in 1945.
Three women: Lucy Mercer (Eleanor’s private secretary), Missy LeHand (FDR’s private secretary) and Margaret (Daisy) Suckley (FDR’s sixth cousin) all shared FDR’s private life for almost 30 years and provided him with the intimacy, adoration and devotion he required in order to function. Eleanor Roosevelt was not oblivious to their liaisons.
One other adoring individual was an influential advisor from his first run for office until the end of his first presidential term. He was a Democrat political operative from Saratoga Springs, NY – Louis Howe.
FDR idolized both his father, James, and his cousin “Teddy” and modeled his career after him. He served in the New York state legislature, as Assistant Secretary of the Navy (under Wilson), as his party’s (Democrat) vice-presidential candidate and as Governor of New York just like his famous cousin had done. Being elected president in 1932 was all part of the plan.”
It might never have happened though, had not Franklin Roosevelt had a truly remarkable and iron will to accomplish whatever he set out to do – that was instilled in him by his mother (in addition to the great good fortune that followed him most of his life). In 1920, he contracted infantile paralysis – polio – while vacationing on Campobello Island, Canada (across a tiny bridge from Lebec, Maine – the eastern-most community in the United States). His fierce, courageous and inspiring determination to overcome his physical afflictions (also reminiscent of TR) enabled him to resume public life later in the decade and, in 1932, made a run for the presidency possible. Next time:FDR’s 100Day assault on the Constitution.